Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.


abortion (1) education (1) physical activity (1) public health (71) sexual health (1) food (1) political correctness (1) Big Food (2) health equity (10) autism (1) emergency contraception (1) breastfeeding (3) Big Soda (2) community health (1) cancer research (1) social math (1) Aurora (1) food access (1) suicide barrier (2) food marketing (5) media analysis (6) Measure O (1) paula deen (1) Richmond (5) social media (2) healthy eating (1) Twitter (1) environmental health (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Sandy Hook (2) SB 402 (1) auto safety (1) cannes lions festival (1) cosmetics (1) institutional accountability (1) race (1) cancer prevention (1) equity (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) child sexual abuse (5) soda taxes (2) tobacco industry (2) collaboration (1) Connecticut shooting (1) campaign finance (1) online marketing (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Newtown (1) soda tax (11) cigarette advertising (1) Sam Kass (1) news strategy (1) indoor smoking ban (1) summer camps (1) Coca-Cola (3) media bites (1) soda industry (4) childhood obestiy conference (1) food environment (1) digital marketing (3) Big Tobacco (3) Marion Nestle (1) health care (1) HPV vaccine (1) apha (3) privilege (1) public health policy (2) front groups (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) naacp (1) sanitation (1) Texas (1) product safety (1) Happy Meals (1) paper tigers (1) democracy (1) Chile (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Rachel Grana (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco tax (1) news monitoring (1) strategic communication (1) values (1) Citizens United (1) water security (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) food justice (1) suicide nets (1) gender (1) food swamps (1) personal responsibility (3) youth (1) American Beverage Association (1) tobacco (5) communication strategy (1) news coverage (1) vaccines (1) childhood adversity (1) weight of the nation (1) seat belt laws (1) measure N (2) prevention (1) soda warning labels (1) new year's resolutions (1) McDonald's (1) default frame (1) built environment (2) PepsiCo (1) food deserts (1) alcohol (5) Twitter for advocacy (1) Whiteclay (4) california (1) social change (1) Proposition 47 (1) ssb (1) obesity (10) white house (1) choice (1) Michelle Obama (1) community violence (1) sports drinks (1) community organizing (1) filibuster (1) government intrusion (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) industry appeals to choice (1) food industry (4) FCC (1) junk food (2) structural racism (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) advocacy (3) Gardasil (1) ACEs (2) news analysis (3) social justice (2) SSBs (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) inequities (1) world water day (1) suicide prevention (2) violence prevention (8) obesity prevention (1) george lakoff (1) nonprofit communications (1) Penn State (3) messaging (3) framing (14) news (2) children's health (3) food and beverage marketing (3) Black Lives Matter (1) stigma (1) sandusky (2) SB 1000 (1) sexual violence (2) beauty products (1) media (7) childhood trauma (3) Joe Paterno (1) Berkeley (2) Telluride (1) prison phone calls (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) language (6) communication (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) community (1) sugary drinks (10) regulation (2) snap (1) Bloomberg (3) junk food marketing (4) genital warts (1) journalism (1) diabetes (1) diabetes prevention (1) Oglala Sioux (3) gun violence (1) Colorado (1) community safety (1) nanny state (2) Dora the Explorer (1) cervical cancer (1) Nickelodeon (1) childhood obesity (1) liana winett (1) water (1) mental health (2) Let's Move (1) women's health (2) sexism (2) Proposition 29 (1) Catholic church (1) beverage industry (2) media advocacy (23) Wendy Davis (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) violence (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) safety (1) SB-5 (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) tobacco control (2) gun control (2) public health data (1) El Monte (3) cap the tap (1) racism (1) chronic disease (2) San Francisco (3) soda (12) Bill Cosby (1) Merck (1) sexual assault (1) Donald Trump (2) target marketing (9) authentic voices (1) election 2016 (1) Tea Party (1) reproductive justice (1) Amanda Fallin (1) marketing (1) elephant triggers (1) prison system (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: