Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.

Golden Gate Bridge (2) personal responsibility (3) messaging (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) SSBs (1) Penn State (3) environmental health (1) community organizing (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) public health (71) community (1) soda tax (11) emergency contraception (1) white house (1) food environment (1) corporate social responsibility (1) food access (1) Wendy Davis (1) community safety (1) food swamps (1) tobacco control (2) Merck (1) Chile (1) Michelle Obama (1) childhood trauma (3) industry appeals to choice (1) diabetes prevention (1) community violence (1) campaign finance (1) safety (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) communication (2) food industry (4) structural racism (1) front groups (1) social media (2) McDonald's (1) childhood adversity (1) cancer prevention (1) sugary drinks (10) sanitation (1) prevention (1) news monitoring (1) Sandy Hook (2) soda (12) beverage industry (2) product safety (1) FCC (1) election 2016 (1) Newtown (1) naacp (1) vaccines (1) Telluride (1) news (2) snap (1) women's health (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) community health (1) inequities (1) stigma (1) Oglala Sioux (3) breastfeeding (3) violence (2) soda warning labels (1) political correctness (1) institutional accountability (1) Gardasil (1) Berkeley (2) social change (1) obesity prevention (1) paper tigers (1) framing (14) childhood lead poisoning (1) weight of the nation (1) Catholic church (1) Citizens United (1) target marketing (9) child sexual abuse (5) childhood obestiy conference (1) advocacy (3) equity (3) cap the tap (1) california (1) news coverage (1) suicide barrier (2) media bites (1) nanny state (2) Sam Kass (1) El Monte (3) Aurora (1) food justice (1) chronic disease (2) Dora the Explorer (1) online marketing (1) language (6) measure N (2) sexism (2) Bill Cosby (1) health care (1) ACEs (2) media analysis (6) PepsiCo (1) sandusky (2) cervical cancer (1) liana winett (1) childhood obesity (1) SB 1000 (1) media advocacy (23) Marion Nestle (1) gun violence (1) food and beverage marketing (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) communication strategy (1) youth (1) built environment (2) public health policy (2) filibuster (1) sexual violence (2) seat belt laws (1) auto safety (1) HPV vaccine (1) Bloomberg (3) Twitter (1) ssb (1) world water day (1) social math (1) authentic voices (1) children's health (3) obesity (10) prison system (1) gatorade bolt game (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) physical activity (1) media (7) cannes lions festival (1) digital marketing (3) genital warts (1) journalism (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) education (1) values (1) george lakoff (1) Connecticut shooting (1) sexual health (1) food deserts (1) cigarette advertising (1) cosmetics (1) Tea Party (1) Colorado (1) Joe Paterno (1) alcohol (5) nonprofit communications (1) diabetes (1) prison phone calls (1) food (1) marketing (1) choice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Whiteclay (4) suicide nets (1) race (1) social justice (2) default frame (1) water security (1) autism (1) new year's resolutions (1) American Beverage Association (1) Proposition 47 (1) gender (1) Let's Move (1) Coca-Cola (3) summer camps (1) Richmond (5) tobacco (5) Black Lives Matter (1) soda industry (4) government intrusion (1) news analysis (3) democracy (1) suicide prevention (2) healthy eating (1) racism (1) violence prevention (8) Happy Meals (1) SB-5 (1) junk food (2) San Francisco (3) apha (3) Big Food (2) strategic communication (1) privilege (1) tobacco tax (1) Texas (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) reproductive justice (1) health equity (10) elephant triggers (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Big Tobacco (3) Amanda Fallin (1) cancer research (1) sports drinks (1) soda taxes (2) sexual assault (1) SB 402 (1) Nickelodeon (1) food marketing (5) regulation (2) Proposition 29 (1) Big Soda (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) paula deen (1) Donald Trump (2) news strategy (1) beauty products (1) abortion (1) public health data (1) indoor smoking ban (1) tobacco industry (2) collaboration (1) water (1) Measure O (1) gun control (2) Rachel Grana (1) junk food marketing (4) mental health (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: