Food marketing to children is not improving rapidly enough, Lori Dorfman tells White House audience

printer friendlyprinter friendly

lori dorfmanMarketing of junk food and sugar-sweetened drinks to children is improving in "baby steps," Lori Dorfman, DrPH, director of PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group, told a White House gathering held by First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Domestic Policy Council.

Far more needs to be done, and quickly, particularly because aggressive food marketing to children via mobile phones and other digital media is growing explosively, said Dorfman, a national authority on food marketing to kids who has written and spoken extensively on the subject.

"I told them I want to turbo charge movement around marketing to children because we need to move much faster. Researchers say that at the rate we're going, we won't have the right balance of ads on TV until 2033. We can't afford to lose a generation of kids who are forming their ideas about what to eat based on billions of dollars of marketing bombarding them every year," Dorfman said of the event, attended by representatives of food and media companies, advocacy and parents groups, government agencies and research organizations.

Inroads being made in marketing healthier food to kids

Dorfman pointed to some small signs of progress: About 90 percent of the ads Nickelodeon aired in 2005 were for junk food; last year, its junk food ads declined to about 70 percent of ads, Dorfman said. Also, members of a voluntary regulatory body, the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), have made pledges of their own choice to improve nutrients in the products they market to children, but by late 2014 all member companies will adhere to a consistent set of nutrition standards. Although a positive sign, this plan still doesn't cover all the junk food marketing children are exposed to, she said.

Perhaps the White House meeting itself is the biggest harbinger of movement, said Dorfman, who also co-chairs the Food Marketing Workgroup.

"The fact we were there in the White House is a key indicator that this is an issue everyone takes seriously now," said Dorfman.

Digital marketing "gets more eyeballs"

While food companies' spending to push their products on children decreased slightly from about $2 billion in 2006 to $1.8 billion in 2009, this slight decline partly fueled by the recession was offset by a 50 percent increase in digital marketing, which is much less expensive to produce than television ads and "gets more eyeballs for the buck," Dorfman told the gathering.

"A 30-second commercial is here and gone," she said. "If you're pushing a Froot Loop around the screen, you can be doing this for 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes at a time and then sending it to a friend."

chuck e cheeseThe exposure to digital marketing games, contests and promotions is even more intense for children from multicultural and low-income communities they get a "double dose" of marketing through general campaigns for children and others that target African American and Latino children in particular. "They're more receptive and approving of ads than their white peers," Dorfman said. "This might be because if you're an African American kid, you don't see yourself in the media that much; when you do, you're really attentive to it."

For example, Chuck E. Cheese's has used African American children to encourage kids to download an app, visit the restaurant and have a photo taken showing the giant Chuck E. Cheese mouse with his arms around them. This kind of marketing appeals to kids and has a long "shelf" life in their homes.

Broad voluntary regulations needed

Dorfman called for the CFBAI to put regulations in place covering all forms of advertising, including product packaging, sponsorships, and marketing in schools as well as stronger nutrition standards for healthy foods.

"Yes, parents have responsibility for their children, but parents don't have responsibility for putting characters on cereal boxes at kids' eye level on supermarket shelves," she said. "Parents are not responsible for fruits snacks that are not fruit. Parents don't have the power to change that. But the companies do."

Carolyn Newbergh is a writer and editor in the Public Health Institute's communications department.

cap the tap (1) food industry (4) nanny state (2) abortion (1) racism (1) public health policy (2) tobacco control (2) emergency contraception (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Measure O (1) privilege (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) political correctness (1) violence prevention (8) Dora the Explorer (1) water (1) summer camps (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) media bites (1) ACEs (2) social media (2) health care (1) soda industry (4) sanitation (1) beauty products (1) diabetes (1) online marketing (1) Richmond (5) Bill Cosby (1) weight of the nation (1) Wendy Davis (1) Donald Trump (2) Aurora (1) prevention (1) Newtown (1) sexism (2) sexual violence (2) Colorado (1) alcohol (5) sandusky (2) front groups (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Oglala Sioux (3) cigarette advertising (1) news strategy (1) food environment (1) california (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Michelle Obama (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) news coverage (1) world water day (1) Whiteclay (4) product safety (1) george lakoff (1) nonprofit communications (1) junk food marketing (4) gatorade bolt game (1) community health (1) structural racism (1) sugary drinks (10) Happy Meals (1) default frame (1) El Monte (3) inequities (1) cannes lions festival (1) junk food (2) Marion Nestle (1) Proposition 29 (1) food (1) American Beverage Association (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) equity (3) media advocacy (23) choice (1) institutional accountability (1) advocacy (3) childhood trauma (3) apha (3) news analysis (3) Coca-Cola (3) elephant triggers (1) white house (1) cancer prevention (1) safety (1) Big Soda (2) San Francisco (3) Bloomberg (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) measure N (2) snap (1) ssb (1) environmental health (1) suicide nets (1) personal responsibility (3) messaging (3) Sam Kass (1) election 2016 (1) Texas (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Big Food (2) public health data (1) children's health (3) tobacco (5) tobacco tax (1) reproductive justice (1) built environment (2) language (6) Tea Party (1) water security (1) sexual health (1) communication strategy (1) food swamps (1) gender (1) news monitoring (1) social justice (2) seat belt laws (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) community violence (1) social change (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) soda tax (11) cosmetics (1) public health (71) filibuster (1) Sandy Hook (2) obesity (10) community organizing (1) new year's resolutions (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) youth (1) chronic disease (2) news (2) breastfeeding (3) HPV vaccine (1) marketing (1) framing (14) corporate social responsibility (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Telluride (1) target marketing (9) PepsiCo (1) Berkeley (2) sexual assault (1) Penn State (3) physical activity (1) paula deen (1) media (7) soda (12) social math (1) Nickelodeon (1) childhood adversity (1) industry appeals to choice (1) paper tigers (1) women's health (2) Amanda Fallin (1) government intrusion (1) violence (2) values (1) prison phone calls (1) regulation (2) suicide prevention (2) SB 1000 (1) childhood obesity (1) health equity (10) suicide barrier (2) democracy (1) tobacco industry (2) SB-5 (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) vaccines (1) Proposition 47 (1) Citizens United (1) Big Tobacco (3) prison system (1) healthy eating (1) beverage industry (2) education (1) Chile (1) liana winett (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Joe Paterno (1) community safety (1) food marketing (5) gun violence (1) auto safety (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) digital marketing (3) child sexual abuse (5) mental health (2) SB 402 (1) Twitter (1) gun control (2) food justice (1) campaign finance (1) soda warning labels (1) naacp (1) media analysis (6) autism (1) Gardasil (1) community (1) food and beverage marketing (3) cancer research (1) collaboration (1) Let's Move (1) genital warts (1) obesity prevention (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) strategic communication (1) food access (1) soda taxes (2) diabetes prevention (1) Rachel Grana (1) McDonald's (1) authentic voices (1) race (1) FCC (1) sports drinks (1) SSBs (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) stigma (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) journalism (1) Catholic church (1) Merck (1) communication (2) cervical cancer (1) food deserts (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: