Why we should stop using the word 'obesity'

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Quick, what image pops into your mind when you see or hear the word "obesity"? You think of a fat person, right? I know I do. I also know that I don't think of junk food or the industry that so heavily promotes it, even though they are a primary culprit behind America's rising rates of type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses.

Obesity is merely a symptom of a much bigger problem. Yet many of the very groups that are working hard to improve health equity by exposing the role of junk food marketing, income inequality, and other forces beyond individual control have nevertheless placed responsibility -- and shame -- for the country's growing waistlines and related health issues squarely on the shoulders of individuals. It's not intentional. But it happens every time we utter that all-too-familiar "O"-word.

This is a problem because once the conversation is framed in ways that highlight individuals, public health advocates must jump over even higher hurdles to show that we have a need for solutions beyond changes in individual behavior.

That's the trap that former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher and physician Pamela Peeke fell into in February when they debated law professor Paul Campos and TV host John Stossel in a panel called "Is Obesity The Government's Business?" Without saying a word, Satcher and Peeke started off at a disadvantage, given the title of the debate.

Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may have done themselves a disservice by framing their recent Weight of the Nation conference using words that focus on fat bodies, rather than on the unhealthy foods that saturate our surroundings or environments that impede physically activity. Genes and lifestyle aren't enough to explain the country's growing battles with food-related chronic illnesses. And even though the CDC ultimately wants to reframe the conversation to show this, approaching the issue with a focus on weight accomplishes just the opposite.

Airing tonight on HBO, a Weight of the Nation documentary series presented by the Institute of Medicine with the CDC and National Institutes of Health will no doubt face the same challenges.

Framing health issues in terms of obesity not only stigmatizes fat people, it also benefits the food industry. As public health lawyer Michele Simon writes, "[I]t is a problem food companies can supposedly help fix. They can market healthier foods! They can help fund playgrounds and exercise programs!" Ever notice how food companies don't shy away from the word? That itself should sound alarm bells for public health advocates.

Of course, avoiding the "O"-word is difficult even when we know it's problematic. BMSG discussed the trouble with using "obesity" as far back as 2006, yet we still find ourselves reaching for it from time to time.

To successfully reframe the issue will be challenging and may take more than a single word. Still, public health advocates should make it a priority to do so. After all, the people who control how a problem is framed have the best chance of influencing the solution. Public health advocates showed this to be true with tobacco when they stopped talking about smoking cessation and started talking about tobacco control. A small shift in language -- coupled with attention to the policies that shaped environments -- produced a big shift in the public's thinking so that we now see the problem as one related mostly to industry, not just individuals. With enough collaboration and creative thinking, public health can do the same with food.


cosmetics (1) Aurora (1) emergency contraception (1) soda taxes (2) institutional accountability (1) Happy Meals (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) environmental health (1) cannes lions festival (1) apha (3) Big Tobacco (3) Joe Paterno (1) Proposition 29 (1) Dora the Explorer (1) beverage industry (2) weight of the nation (1) authentic voices (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) world water day (1) community (1) Oglala Sioux (3) strategic communication (1) education (1) cap the tap (1) suicide barrier (2) framing (14) food marketing (5) advocacy (3) genital warts (1) values (1) Measure O (1) target marketing (9) seat belt laws (1) chronic disease (2) news coverage (1) communication (2) reproductive justice (1) george lakoff (1) campaign finance (1) American Beverage Association (1) breastfeeding (3) news strategy (1) Nickelodeon (1) soda (12) sandusky (2) ssb (1) online marketing (1) tobacco tax (1) childhood adversity (1) default frame (1) measure N (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) Catholic church (1) race (1) community health (1) Bill Cosby (1) industry appeals to choice (1) public health policy (2) abortion (1) food justice (1) tobacco control (2) Big Soda (2) soda tax (11) Richmond (5) prison phone calls (1) collaboration (1) safety (1) junk food (2) Bloomberg (3) Whiteclay (4) soda warning labels (1) Tea Party (1) personal responsibility (3) media (7) paula deen (1) Let's Move (1) Merck (1) liana winett (1) healthy eating (1) vaccines (1) news (2) children's health (3) marketing (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Sam Kass (1) media bites (1) corporate social responsibility (1) diabetes prevention (1) suicide nets (1) food (1) structural racism (1) youth (1) Berkeley (2) Rachel Grana (1) food environment (1) indoor smoking ban (1) choice (1) El Monte (3) inequities (1) election 2016 (1) tobacco (5) child sexual abuse (5) stigma (1) sexual violence (2) water security (1) tobacco industry (2) snap (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) FCC (1) HPV vaccine (1) SB-5 (1) paper tigers (1) equity (3) childhood trauma (3) water (1) Newtown (1) sexual assault (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) prison system (1) women's health (2) diabetes (1) built environment (2) San Francisco (3) news monitoring (1) suicide prevention (2) autism (1) news analysis (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) soda industry (4) health care (1) sports drinks (1) digital marketing (3) community organizing (1) Michelle Obama (1) childhood obesity (1) alcohol (5) PepsiCo (1) Colorado (1) obesity prevention (1) Proposition 47 (1) racism (1) naacp (1) front groups (1) mental health (2) health equity (10) Wendy Davis (1) violence (2) physical activity (1) Gardasil (1) obesity (10) food access (1) cervical cancer (1) california (1) community violence (1) social justice (2) democracy (1) Texas (1) violence prevention (8) Citizens United (1) gender (1) social math (1) public health (71) elephant triggers (1) community safety (1) social change (1) public health data (1) white house (1) cigarette advertising (1) Black Lives Matter (1) nonprofit communications (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) auto safety (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food and beverage marketing (3) political correctness (1) prevention (1) journalism (1) sanitation (1) media analysis (6) childhood lead poisoning (1) sugary drinks (10) Penn State (3) language (6) privilege (1) Twitter (1) Sandy Hook (2) beauty products (1) media advocacy (23) SSBs (1) new year's resolutions (1) communication strategy (1) Chile (1) Amanda Fallin (1) product safety (1) social media (2) filibuster (1) cancer research (1) food swamps (1) messaging (3) Marion Nestle (1) sexism (2) Coca-Cola (3) Big Food (2) sexual health (1) Telluride (1) Connecticut shooting (1) gun control (2) nanny state (2) food deserts (1) summer camps (1) ACEs (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) SB 1000 (1) cancer prevention (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) government intrusion (1) Donald Trump (2) SB 402 (1) regulation (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) food industry (4) McDonald's (1) gun violence (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) junk food marketing (4)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: